Contents
The two most important questions to ask when choosing a fuel (Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) vs Firewood) for power plants are, “What’s the difference between an RDF and firewood?” and, “Which is better for my needs?” This article will attempt to address those questions by describing some of the basic technical differences between these types of stoves.
A recent study explored the relative merits of RDF and Firewood in generating electricity. In this study, five units were tested on the same logs, each of 2.1 m in length. The productivity and cost of the machines varied widely (ranging from 1.1 to 2.1 ha per tonne, depending on the model). The productivity was greater when the logs were sorted, thereby decreasing costs and increasing productivity. Fuel use was relatively constant, but the energy balance was often negative.
Why Refuse derived fuel is best?
Wood burning produces a smaller quantity of smoke, which releases less fine particles into the air. Inhaling too much smoke can cause respiratory problems, which in turn can affect the immune system. This is why a comparison of RDF and Firewood is so important. In addition, the hotter kiln-drying process of RDF eliminates residual pesticides, mold, and invasive pests, which makes them suitable for burning in heating. Furthermore, many state parks have started allowing people to burn pre-packaged wood instead of buying it in the market, which has further reduced the costs of acquiring and processing the wood.
What is Refuse derived fuel?
RDF is more sustainable because it is less moisture-rich. Therefore, it produces less smoke and emits fewer fine particles into the atmosphere. The smoke is difficult to expel, and excessive smoke can irritate the lungs and impair the immune system, which can lead to asthma attacks and other health problems. In addition to the lower cost, RDF is a more environmentally friendly option, since it is more environmentally friendly than firewood.
How can you increase the amount of production of refuse derived fuel?
Despite its cost, RDF burns cleaner and has fewer pollutants than firewood. It releases fewer fine particles and smoke, which is good news for the environment. It is also less hazardous to the environment. Moreover, burning RDF does not cause smog. Nevertheless, the heat used to kiln-dry the wood is not only healthier but also safer. It also means that it is more economical.
Advantages of Refuse Derived fuel
Another benefit of RDF is its low moisture content. The resulting smoke has lower levels of pollutants than firewood. The PAH levels of firewood are similar, but the wood-burning method is more sustainable. It is also less expensive than charcoal, which means that it can be used in place of charcoal. The two types are both environmentally friendly, but RDF has the advantage of being more affordable. It is also more environmentally friendly.
Comparison of RDF vs Coal
| Factors | RDF | Coal |
| Calorific value (kCal/Kg) | 3500 to 3700 | 4000 |
| Cost per Ton in Rs. | 2000 | 6000 |
| Sulphur (%) | 0.2-0.5 | 0.4 |
| Moisture content (%) | 10 | 39 |
| Ash Content (%) | < 15 | 4.2 |
| Nox (%) | 1-1.5 | 1.2 |
| Carbon (%) | 35-40 | 31.4 |
| Oxygen (%) | 25-30 | 7.4 |
| Hydrogen (%) | 5-8 | 4.3 |
Comparison of Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) vs Firewood
| Factors | RDF | Firewood |
| Calorific value (kCal/Kg) | 3500 to 3700 | 4000 |
| Cost per Ton in Rs. | 2000 | 16500 |
| Sulphur (%) | 0.2-0.5 | 0.01 |
| Moisture content (%) | 10 | 10-20 |
| Ash Content (%) | < 15 | 24-26 |
| Nox (%) | 1-1.5 | 0.75 |
| Carbon (%) | 35-40 | 3.2 |
| Oxygen (%) | 25-30 | 35 |
| Hydrogen (%) | 5-8 | 8 |
Comparison of RDF vs Furnace oil
| Factors | RDF | Furnace oil |
| Calorific value (kCal/Kg) | 3500 to 3700 | 10000 |
| Cost per Ton in Rs. | 2000 | 44000 |
| Sulphur (%) | 0.2-0.5 | 4 |
| Moisture content (%) | 10 | 1 |
| Ash Content (%) | < 15 | 0.1 |
| Nox (%) | 1-1.5 | 0.1 |
| Carbon (%) | 35-40 | 8-30 |
| Oxygen (%) | 25-30 | 5-20 |
| Hydrogen (%) | 5-8 | 0.1 |
The future of RDF and Waste management in general
When compared to firewood, RDF burns better and costs less. Freshly felled trees are green and contain 60 percent water. The wood is typically kiln-dried or naturally seasoned. The natural drying process can take anywhere from six to 18 months and is much more environmentally friendly. However, this comparison of RDF and firewood is important because each fuel has its advantages and disadvantages.
Both types of firewood are better for burning. Compared to firewood, RDF is cheaper and more environmentally friendly. It burns more efficiently in fireplaces. It also has more flavor and smell. Both types of firewood are better for cooking, but they differ in terms of moisture content. For home use, kiln-dried wood is superior. For campfires, kiln-dried firewood burns more cleanly.
Using RDF instead of coal in power plants
When compared to firewood, RDF has a lower moisture content. Compared to freshly-felled firewood, kiln-dried firewood is more efficient for virtually any use. It’s better for campfires, but not for heating homes. For heating a home, kiln-dried wood is a better option. The moisture content in firewood is lower than that of RDF.
Final Words
Both types are environmentally friendly. While kiln-dried firewood has a lower moisture content than RDF, it is still better for heating your home. This type of firewood can be expensive and does not burn as cleanly as kiln-dried firewood. It is also cheaper than kiln-dried firewood, which is better for campfires. If you need to buy firewood, choose the best one for your needs.
Pingback: The Power Generation From Refuse Derived Fuel RDF: A New Trend In Power Generation